Superman, the 1940’s: Lois Lane’s Hats Part 2

As we continue to follow Lois’ exploits in millinery, one question comes to mind, or at least to my mind. Does she really get paid well enough to afford all of these hats? I can’t recall the story at present, but it involves designer clothing rip-offs. In it, Lois lays out $150 (close to a cool $2,300 in today’s money) for an original creation. Then there’s this exchange:

Superman (1939) #23 “Fashions in Crime!”

(which makes Lois seeing the same dress on sale for $7.50 two panels later all the more fun), so perhaps Lois does have the money.

As an aside, Clark’s reaction make me wonder how much he lays out on all those identical suits of his. Eight bucks each? Ten? Clark, you spendthrift, you!

But back to Lois. So she has the money, maybe, but does she have the space? Sure, some of these creations look collapsable, but still, if Lois wears a new hat every week, where does she put them all? It looks as though they’d crowd her out of hat and home! (‘Dad joke.’ Sorry.)

Finally, a note: in Part One of this series, I used sources to help me identify the types of hats Lois was wearing to the best of my poor, fashion-ignorant ability. But from Superman #9 onward, the artists often drift so far afield from those that I simply can’t. I leave it to you, if you wish, to try it yourself. If you do so, be certain to let me know so I can include the info. If you like, I’ll be happy to also include your name or non de web and where to see what you do on the wild ‘n wooly web.

Now on to the hats.

In Superman #9 Lois decides to wear a cushion affixed to a skullcap. Or maybe it’s a flower like the one Peter Gabriel used to wear on stage. (Yes, I know hats like that have a real name—I think it’s another fascinator—but look at that thing, be honest, and tell me it doesn’t resemble a cushion)

Superman (1939) #9 “The Phony Pacifists”

Also, for some reason, Superman is playing hide and seek with her. Oh, sure, the story supplies a reason, but I’m sure that somewhere in its archives Superdickery has a more amusing one. If not, Mike Miksch is getting slow.

In the same issue, while investigating the “Mystery in Swasey Swamp,” Lois sports a serious feather in her cap. Two of them in fact. Don’t get too close, fella! She’ll tickle your nose!

Superman (1939) #9 “Mystery in Swasey Swamp”

(I suspect the odd angle of the feathers in that second panel is just a perspective error on penciller Paul Cassidy‘s part, but still… Also, for some interesting information on Cassidy and the working of the Shuster Shop, look here)

This next hat comes from “Jackson’s Murder Ring.”

Superman (1939) #9 “Jackson’s Murder Ring”

But she does have a heart, Clark! A purple one! Can’t your fancy super-vision see it perched on her head? Because I certainly can.

This isn’t a hat, but I simply have to include it. Lois is undercover, and she’s chosen an utterly impenetrable disguise: 

Superman (1939) #9 “Jackson’s Murder Ring”

So if you ever wondered why it took Lois so long to work out Superman’s secret identity, now you know.

(If ever. I don’t really know—yet—when or, to be more accurate, when or if in this continuity Lois learns that Clark is Superman, or Superman is Clark, depending on how the writer at the moment is handling the character. Since these older comics technically occur on Earth 2 until the first Crisis—a whole ‘nother ball of wax that I intend to get to eventually—took place, I’m not sure this Lois ever does. I do know the ever-rebooting DC eventually decided to let the Post (first) Crisis Lois know that Clark is Superman [I think it happened in 1997 to coincide with Lois learning Clark’s other identity in the TV show Lois and Clark: the New Adventures of Superman], but, as I said, I’m not sure that Lois is the same as the Lois in the 1940’s continuity, of the ‘New 52’ whatsis, or even the Lois of the current one. I hope so, as in a collection I recently read they are married and have a child, but you never know what corporate heads will decide to do. Look at what happened to poor Peter Parker because of all Marvel’s Civil War hoopla. Anyway, in either case, I’m not sure about the Lois of Earth 2, although I think perhaps she and Clark married there, too. At least I know there was a teenaged Superman Jr. or some equivalent zipping around for a while in World’s Finest in the 70’s, a character I fully intend to cover later, because what I recall of him is truly strange. Ah, the twisted web continuity shifts weave!)

In Superman #10, Lois sports this perky number. I wish I could show you all the panels showing that feather tickling the sky, but I don’t want to go overboard.

Superman (1939) #10 “The Talent Agency Fraud”

In the next story, Lois finally goes Full Robin Hood, green dress and all.

Superman (1939) #10 “The Spy Ring of Righab Bey”

Is the takeaway never go Full Robin Hood in the DC Universe unless you’re Green Arrow (who I’m fairly sure hadn’t been created yet)? Possibly, but if so, the main reason not to do it is because without a bow, you look a trifle odd.

If you were leering at the receptionist there, hold on to your capes, because Lois is the next woman to use that outfit.

Superman (1939) #10 “The Spy Ring of Righab Bey”

Although Wayne Boring never draws Lois quite as slinky as he does the previous girls, who were criminals, after all. Still, I wonder if this is where the writers of the aforementioned Lois and Clark series got the idea to dress Teri Hatcher in a similar outfit (look at about 0:40).

In “The Dukalia Spy Ring” Lois wears, well, this:

Superman (1939) #10 “The Dukalia Spy Ring”

I’d call it a baseball cap, but it’s… not. 

For the Superman #11 tale “Zimba’s Gold Badge Terrorists,” Lois chooses lime green and, yet again, what I can only refer to as ‘this.’ Back view:

Superman (1939) #11 “Zimba’s Gold Badge Terrorists”

Front view:

Superman (1939) #11 “Zimba’s Gold Badge Terrorists”

I think that the artist—Leo Nowak—got a little confused, but then again, later views of both back and front look pretty much the same. Maybe it’s the wind of Clark vanishing and showing up again.

Lois keeps wearing this hat for a really long time in this story, so we get more looks again, both back:

Superman (1939) #11 “Zimba’s Gold Badge Terrorists”

And front:

Superman (1939) #11 “Zimba’s Gold Badge Terrorists”

But I’m honestly not sure they help any. It’s an enigma wrapped in a mystery perched upon Lois’ head.

Moving on, in “The Corinthville Caper,” Lois sticks to green, but wears a different hat. Again, Leo Nowak is kind enough to provide us with a rear view: 

Superman (1939) #11 “The Corinthville Caper”

And front:

Superman (1939) #11 “The Corinthville Caper”

I don’t know what to say about this creation except that perhaps something has been snacking upon it. Also, Lois, please! Clark is not cowardly; he’s mild-mannered. We’re told so. Often.

For the next story, ‘The Yellow Plague,” Lois proudly dons a bottle cork.

Superman (1939) #11 “The Yellow Plague”

Which soon begins to slip off her head.

I suppose that’s better than, ah, popping.

Had enough? I hope not, because I haven’! Stay tuned, because next time the hats get truly strange. And yes, I’m looking right at the bottle cork hat as I write this. Unless you’ve read these oldies, too, you have no idea…

…but you will.

I do not claim ownership of any of the partial image representations posted here.

Superman, the 1930’s-40’s: Lois Lane’s Hats Part 1

Ah, the forties. The War Years (or the New War Years, I suppose, as opposed to the Great War Years, no one as yet anticipating the subsequent wars the United States would be involved in —or involve herself in—one after another). In such changing times, when the nation’s women went to work with a will, what was a fashion-conscious ‘girl reporter’ supposed to wear? Great heavens! What should she place upon her head?

Most of the period I’m going to cover is technically pre-war for the U.S., although towards the end of this run Superman will begin beating the drums, so to speak, and at the very end begin to give whole-hearted support to the U.S. effort. I think it gives an interesting insight, to those who notice such things, into the fashion of the era. While I myself am not especially a fan of style, I do find myself capable of being amused by it, and, as I watch the parade of headgear Lois dons and often loses, I can’t help but chuckle and wonder, too.

One reason for my merriment is that this is all, so far as I know, Joe Shuster’s work. Even after the Shuster Shop was up and running, Shuster himself did the pencil and ink work on Superman’s, Clark’s, and Lois’s heads (if this is incorrect, please let me know) in the early years of both the Action Comics stories and Superman, so I’m guessing that Lois’ headgear was his work, and if not, at the very least met with his approval. 

Clearly Joe enjoyed variety.

Not that we got much of that at first. The stories that appear in Action for the first few years aren’t exactly devoid of Lois, bus neither does she have the costarring role she soon takes on in Superman. Her hats, I suppose, reflect this.

First up: a rather ordinary brim slouch. 

Action Comics (1938) #1 “The Coming of Superman”

Next, either a very plain turban or else, heaven help us, a snood. Oh, Lois! Did you leave in that much of a hurry?

Action Comics (1938) #2 “Revolution in San Monte”

Lois next dons a rather subdued if stylish picture hat:

Action Comics (1938) #5 “Superman and the Dam”

And then some sort of day hat:

Action Comics (1938) #7 “Superman Joins the Circus”

The first issue of Superman featured reprints from Action, and it took over half a year (Superman was at first a quarterly magazine) to get its legs under it. But by the end of the magazine’s first year, Lois was ready with, ah, this:

Superman (1939) #4 “Luthor’s Undersea City”

think that’s a pillbox hat of some sort, but frankly, it looks like a jar lid, knurls and all. 

Two issues later, perhaps to celebrate Superman going bi-monthly, Lois would get a little more stylish with a tan fascinator:

Superman (1939) #6 “The Rulers of Gateston”

And a smart green skimmer as well:

Superman (1939) #6 “The Construction Scam”
Superman (1939) #6 “The Construction Scam”

In the next issue, Lois sports either a red small saucer hat or a beret—I suspect the former—with a sporty bow on top:

Superman (1939) #7 “The Three Kingpins of Crime”
Superman (1939) #7 “The Three Kingpins of Crime”

And in the next story that issue, “The Gay City Plague” (No, it’s some sort of gas turning people into glass. Really. Hush), she wears the same hat, but in green:

Superman (1939) #7 “The Gay City Plague”

Bored? Lois has the cure! Again, I’m not sure what this thing is, although my guess is some sort of ‘Robin Hood’ Tyrolean hat.

Superman (1939) #7 “Bert Runyan’s Campaign”
Superman (1939) #7 “Bert Runyan’s Campaign”

(Incidentally, for those artist enthusiasts among you, these stories in Superman #7 were mostly penciled and inked by Wayne Boring as Joe Shuster began to find himself incapable of carrying the ever-increasing art load.)

And for election night in that story, Lois spruces up in, well…

Superman (1939) #7 “Bert Runyan’s Campaign”
Superman (1939) #7 “Bert Runyan’s Campaign”

Look, online research can only get you so far, folks. All I know is that if it’s the same hat, Lois has fed it too much and it has now grown and is ready to reproduce, tribble-style.

(If any fashion-literate person recognizes this thing perched on Lois’ noggin, please let me know.)

Now and then Lois does repeat, of course. In “The Giants of Professor Zee,” she seems to have donned the same green saucer hat she wore in “The Gay City Plague.”

Superman (1939) #8 “The Giants of Professor Zee”

Then again, sooner or later she has to, right? Plus, Lois is about to pull one of her crazier stunts (details at another time, I hope), so she probably isn’t thinking much about her appearance.

Later that issue, Lois wears either some sort of flop beret or more likely a turban. It’s strange, either way.

Superman (1939) #8 “The Fifth Column”

In the next story, our intrepid ‘girl reporter’ sticks with red, but returns to saucers. Not one of the earlier hats, though. No, indeed! This one has a skullcap

Superman (1939) #8 “The Carnival Crooks”

Bored? Just wait! As the series gets more popular and the relationship between the ‘triangle’ (or perhaps helix) of Clark, Lois and Superman gets more intense, Lois’ hats become much more extreme. Clark has some definite feelings about that, by the way:

Action Comics (1938) #9 “Wanted: Superman”

Oh, he says it’s about her infatuation with Superman, but I think Clark is laughing about Lois’ hats.

As for me. I’m not done with them yet. We’ve only begun to plumb Lois’ collection, and I know you’re as eager to see more as I am.

You see, we need the laughs, too.

Note: If you’re interested in the hat terms I use, here are my sources: Vintage Dancer’s “Women’s 30s Hat History” and “1940s Hats History,” and the Art Deco Society of California’s Deco Life page “The Mad Cap.” I wouldn’t have known where to begin without them other than ‘Hee-hee, lookit that!’ so they are all much appreciated.

I do not claim ownership of any of the partial image representations posted here.

Superman Costume Evolution: The Early Years

The Man of Steel’s costume, despite what you might think, has come a long way since Joe Shuster first introduced him to us in Action Comics #1. It actually evolved in a very short time, but evolve it did.

If you know the background of the development of Superman, then you know that he began—sort of—as the featured villain in a Jerry Siegel story for which Shuster drew illustrations. In it, the ‘superman’ has psionic powers, for lack of a better term, instead of mostly physical ones, and, of course, he’s bald. For whatever reason, either Shuster, Siegal or both thought that a good way of indicating villainy was to depict a character as bald, which will cost Luthor his locks (yes, he had them, and, no, there was no ‘Lex’ when the character was first introduced) very soon. After deciding a heroic superman might see better, the character’s appearance underwent various and sundry transformations as Siegal kept pitching the character, but when he and Shuster reunited (after an understandable spat, since Siegal had tried to shop Superman around with other, better known artists), and got an offer to publish a story, they decided on this:

Action Comics (1938) #1 “The Coming of Superman”

What’s the first thing I noticed when I read this comic? No boots! Or boots colored the same as his tights, anyway. Superman appears to be wearing a footed onesie with red trunks pulled over it, but if you look carefully, you can see what appears to be some sort of high sandal straps wrapping around his calves. I’m assuming those straps were meant as a nod to Hercules, since his and Superman’s powers are pretty much the same at this point. (and although I may be the first to make the costume link, I’m certainly not the first to make the comparison: See Action #1)

From the same page:

Whoops! Forgot to color in his trunks! Scandal! Scandal!

The ‘S’ on Superman’s chest is a small triangle and completely golden with a red ‘S.’ In bigger panels of later comics some red can be seen, but not much, and sometimes the emblem will appear completely golden. The yoke of Superman’s shirt is rounded, too, and from his front, you can’t see where his cape attaches. Finally:

There’s no ‘S’ on his cape at all.

That’s pretty much it. Superman already sports his familiar golden belt and red trunks (most of the time. Haha!), and the colors are the same, but I admit that when I first read these stories (back when I bought a giant-sized anniversary edition of the first Action comics), I was a bit surprised.

On the cover, which Shuster drew earlier than he did the first story in Action, Superman has boots instead o the sandal-things (or booties. For cryin’ out loud, Joe!), and they are red, not blue, although I think I can see the strap lines, too. Possibly Shuster made the footwear blue in the comic to slightly simplify his work? (Or whoever was the colorist did; I can’t find a credit anywhere save for the cover, where it’s Jack Adler of Green Lantern (Silver Age] and other fame.)

Action Comics (1938) #1 cover art

Also, the ‘S’ is definitely red. It is often yellow and the emblem a simple triangle in the comics, again, most likely, to make the task of drawing and coloring the character more simple, but here Superman proudly bears a wide golden shield with a big red ‘S’ on it, a harbinger of things to come.

Indeed, changes would be coming soon, but not too soon. In fact, in Action #3, “Superman Battles Death Underground,” a story about exposing a skinflint mine operator in which our hero poses as an immigrant miner, Superman doesn’t even wear his costume. Hard to believe now, I know, but it makes sense in the climate of comics at the time. The other pages of Action Comics were filled with hardboiled characters of various stripes who all operated in everyday clothes, except for Zatara the Master Magician (one of several characters so billed in Detective Comics, Inc.’s and other companies’ stables, although Zatara would endure, after a fashion, much longer than most), a refined type who always wore a tux and top-hat. Admittedly, since Zatara’s ‘day job’ (more like night job, as his heroics mostly occurred in broad daylight) was performing in clubs as a stage magician, such garb was part of the tools of his trade, even if he seems slightly overdressed when Zatara’s merely having lunch with friends. In any case, given the types with whom he shared the magazine, Superman dressing as a regular person probably didn’t seem out of place at all.

So… Superman can’t fly and doesn’t wear his costume. I can’t help thinking that Jon Peters would be so very happy!

In Action #6 we first see Superman wearing proper boots within a comic:

Action Comics (1938) #6 “Superman’s Phony Manager”

And, though difficult to see (sorry for the bad scan), the ‘S’ on his chest is definitely red. After this, sometimes the colorist would forget or not bother because of tight angles, but overall, the ‘S’ will remain red.

Action Comics (1938) #6 “Superman’s Phony Manager”

The chest emblem is also larger, although still a simple triangle instead of the more familiar stylized pentagon. Also, the cape is attached to the neck of Superman’s shirt at the front instead of somewhere in the back. although this will revert to the older way in the next issue. Ironically, this image is not of Superman, but an actor pretending to be him as part of a scam. That guy’s handler must’ve been on the ball, since he put his protégé in a costume Superman hadn’t even been wearing yet!

In Action #18 Superman’s cape is now attached to the edges of his shirt in the front the familiar manner (he must’ve liked the look) and will remain that way. The yoke of his shirt is now more of a slight curve than an arc, too. That pesky ‘S’ is still so small, though!

Action Comics (1938) #18 “Superman Meets the Ultra-Humanite”

In Superman #4 (Yes, our hero is now popular enough to get his own bimonthly magazine with three stories or more of his own while still keeping the star spot in Action), we see the golden ‘S’ emblem on his cape for the first time (it will be red and gold, too, from time to time until someone, probably management, finally settled on gold), although we still have ‘triangle S’ on his chest. The cape emblem and the more elaborate cape flow were both the work of Paul Cassidy, whom Shuster hired to do inking and detail work as Shuster’s workload increased. The work below is of another artist, Leo Nowak, who followed Cassidy’s lead on both:

Superman (1939) #4 “The Invisible Luthor”

And finally, in Superman #5 (and at some point thereabouts in Action, too) we see a full-sized stylized ‘S’ emblem on his chest, also the contribution of Cassidy. Cassidy was also responsible for the making permanent the ‘modern’ look of attaching Superman’s cape to the sides of the front of his shirt neck. which you can also clearly see below in this panel, penciled and inked by Cassidy:

Superman (1939) #5 “The Slot Machine Racket”

I must confess: I love seeing that big, stylized red ‘S’ at last! Thank you, Paul!

The tops of Superman’s boots now angle up from the back of his calves and end, not with a point on his shin, but with a small indent, and they are double-stitched at the top, too, as you can see below in these panels penciled by Wayne Boring and inked by Paul Lauretta.

Superman (1939) #5 “The Slot Machine Racket”
Superman (1939) #5 “The Slot Machine Racket”

Superman’s boots will retain this design even up until today.

And that, as they say, is that, except that by now Joe Shuster, as you can see, had several other assistants helping him draw, ink, and color the stories, among them Paul Cassidy, Leo Nowak, John Sikela, Ed Dobrotka, and Wayne Boring, who would soon concentrate on the new Superman daily newspaper strip. Instead of working for Detective Comics, Inc., though, although that would gradually change, at first these fellows worked directly for Joe Shuster in what would be called the Shuster Shop. For details on these artists and others in the Shuster Shop, look here.

I do not claim ownership of any of the partial image representations posted here.

Greetings, Mortals!

Haha! Seriously, Hi, folks. What you’re about to read, or perhaps are already reading and flipped back to see what all this crazy writing is about, is the highlights of a long love affair between myself and comics.

Yes, comics. Specifically, superhero comics. Oh, I’ve read other types over the years, and I enjoy them, too, but my first and main love has always been superheroes. Why? Search me. Larger than life? Able to fix rotten situations relatively easily (Which, incidentally, might explain why I prefer older comics to the ‘latest and greatest’)? I don’t know, and I haven’t asked my analyst, so for right now let’s just go with ‘I like ’em.’ Perhaps as you read this blog, you can decide and tell me.

So what’s in here? Oh, a little bit of everything. I’m interested in both how characters came to be as they were, are, and will be as well as making up reasons for what I read that are often silly, but fun, too, at least for me, and I hope for you. I’ll cover things like costume development, from Batman’s cape to Lois Lane’s hats (yes, hats: you won’t believe it), how the character changes and why I think that happened, For example, did you know that when Superman began, he operated much like the Batman? No cozy relationship with the police (the Batman’s has ebbed and flowed over the years), no particular compulsion against threatening people, and you got the sense that he really meant it, too. I haven’t followed Superman in recent years much outside of one collection (I have some more lined up to read now , though), but I know that wasn’t the case through the 1960’s, 70’s, and 80’s, or even the 90’s. 

Now, I’m going to ask one thing of my readers, such as I may have. I fully realize this blog may never be more than something created for my own entertainment, and that’s fine, so no, this is not a pitch for money. I’m not a working writer and may never be, and even if by some miracle I become one, this blog will not be used to boost sales or the like.

No. What I ask of you is this: if you’re intrigued, if you get interested, buy some comics! Support the medium. Don’t just go to the movies: I will confess right now that I have seen very few live action superhero movies, and I’ve not liked any of them much because they nearly always distort the characters in order to ‘broaden the film’s appeal’ and, frankly, they usually accomplish this by dumbing down either the character, his story, or both (I have nothing against Sam Jackson playing Nick Fury, but I do about making Thunderbolt Ross an absolute tool the way he was in the first Hulk movie; that was done to avoid exploring the nuances of his character, which in turn lessens the tragedy of Bruce Banner). Case in point: the Batman’s secret identity used to get exposed in the comics about once every five years, max (if that). However, in the first three films (I’m talking the 80’s and 90’s, kids, not the more recent films), he was exposed in every single film. Tony Stark’s cover is blown in the first Iron Man film and to a villain at that. Oh, I know Stark himself revealed it at the end, too (which I wasn’t too happy about), but I think that was a case of the writers trying to sync with current Marvel storylines. Even so, that first film had diddly squat to do with those. The whole point of The Invincible Iron Man has always been a near-unbeatable being on the surface and a fragile human within the armor. Couldn’t we simply have stuck with that for one film?

Of course, I know why: revealing the secret identity is a cheap, easy plot device. Better yet, as a bonus you get the face of the actor you’re paying a bazillion bucks on screen just a little more instead of a mask that anyone could wear. In other words, Hollywood logic.

Comics don’t have to resort to those tricks because they let you inside the character’s head. You don’t have to see Peter Parker’s face unmasked to know he’s straining to hold a runaway train back.

Why? Because in a comic, you can see his thoughts, and they tell the whole story. And yes, I know, I know, but all the people see how human he is! Sorry folks, but to me, that’s cheap writing and also undermines the problem the character has: he is ‘just a kid’ through much of the early run of the comic, and yet no one knows that, which is why Jameson’s schtick continues to work, kind of. Spider-man lives with that and yet keeps being a hero, keeps saving people every day. That, to me, adds to the depth of the character much more than blowing his identity does.

Of course, as I said, the fact that the drawn Spider-man doesn’t cost 32 something million bucks the way Tobey Maguire did for the second and third films may also have something to do with it. Not that I begrudge Maguire his pay; it’s simply the reality of the thing. If you’re paying for that face and its expressions, then you’re going to want to use them as much as possible and never mind how much you screw up the idea that one of the core concepts of the character is that Peter has strong reasons for always keeping his face concealed when he’s Spider-man.

In a comic, on the other hand, thanks to thought bubbles, you can see spectacular action scenes, see facial expressions when possible, and know what the character is feeling without constantly resorting to unmasking him, all thanks to the combined efforts of a writer and an artist (even when they’re one and the same). It’s a unique medium that is able to convey a story in a unique manner.

But I digress.

Buy and read comics. You have a wonderful medium for them now: it’s as though tablets were made for comics. The colors are bright, the text clear, you can zoom in on panels, and your younger sibling can’t sneak in and snip the UPC code from the covers for some stupid school fundraiser while you’re out of the house the way mine did. If you like them, it’s worth your while, I think, to subscribe to services like Marvel Unlimited. I wish DC had something similar, as their DC Universe collection, last time I looked, was sadly lacking in that area, although it does have all their animated movies and Batman: the Animated Series, which makes it a good deal. You can’t go much wrong with Bruce Timm (Yes, I enjoy animated features, but generally not as much as comics). But with MU, you can dig into the past, see where these characters came from and how interesting and/or silly they were or have become. You don’t have to worry about the mailman messing up your new issues, either the way I did. The only problem is ownership, but I hope someday soon that will be solved, and until it does, it will affect many more things than comics.

Anyway, rant over. Prepare to be amused, astounded, or simply astonished that I would actually find this or that interesting. Either way, to the Comicsmoble, Readin’! We have an odyssey to begin!

(er, Dad joke. Sorry. Blame ZeFrank.)

I do not claim ownership of any of the partial image representations posted here.